Then we will see how much they want to sell it. Those so called Scientist in the GMO industry should be the 1st to feed their own children I see people here that obviously don't know what they are talking about. ACCESSIBILITY of FOOD to those who are really hungry and not THE NEED TO PRODUCE MORE.
If the world has anything to fight for, this is the MAIN EVENT to go for. Confusing need versus want --- we have been conditioned and/or conformed to over eat. In the FAO/WHO expert consultation in 2003 (. pdf), WHO and FAO have considered potential problems of the technological divide and the unbalanced distribution of benefits and risks between developed and developing countries and the problem often becomes even more acute through the existence of intellectual property rights and patenting that places an advantage on the strongholds of scientific and technological expertise. And (f) any unintended effects which could result from the gene insertion. While theoretical discussions have covered a broad range of aspects, the three main issues debated are the potentials to provoke allergic reaction (allergenicity), gene transfer and outcrossing.
As a matter of principle, the transfer of genes from commonly allergenic organisms to non-allergic organisms is discouraged unless it can be demonstrated that the protein product of the transferred gene is not allergenic. At harvest and remains so through to the table might ease my concerns. 400 un scientists studied gmo's and found they do not increase yields just do a search. monsanto hurts non gmo producers by crossing with their crops and will not pay for the losses of the farmers or consumers that are sick from this new crops such as bt corn that will kill bees or some humansI don't understand why they bother to say that when they're making billions and already have modified so much they still cant seem to manage to feed world hunger. The susceptibility of non-target organisms (e. g. How many allergies, health concerns, crisis, etc were there prior to corporate consumption of the natural necessities of life: If the MONSTER SCIENTIST won, there is no reason for us to live anymore. In the end you could say documentaries such as this is a win-win for them. The FDA woman says that there needs to be no labels because GMOs are not different from the original foods. Why is there advocacy on Fair Trade? Big News on GMO drug administration require testing for. And increased use of chemicals in agriculture. Whenever novel varieties of organisms for food use are developed using the traditional breeding methods that had existed before the introduction of gene technology, some of the characteristics of organisms may be altered, either in a positive or a negative way. While foods developed using traditional breeding methods are not generally tested for allergenicity, protocols for the testing of GM foods have been evaluated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and WHO. Includes blogs, news, community conversations How Avoid Foods frequently asked questions answers prepared who response concerns from. I've heard that GMO is a reason for infertility (studies were conducted testing on lab rats). Natural selection( which has been going on for millions upon millions of years) and selective breeding set forth by Mendel( keeping only the plants that carry the characteristic your looking for and rejecting all others) Which is what our ansectors have been practicing any ways. And that is the processed mass produced crops.
you seem to grade everyone. or should i say degrade everyone.. However, public attention has focused on the risk side of the risk-benefit equation, often without distinguishing between potential environmental impacts and public health effects of GMOs. Consumer confidence in the safety of food supplies in Europe has decreased significantly as a result of a number of food scares that took place in the second half of the 1990s that are unrelated to GM foods. The use of 'aid' as a tool of economic engineering is well-documented (i. e. The real concerns with GM is in the pace of the industry, which is fueled by the monopoly of the corporations. Only the truth matters.. Look up information on Monsantos. Truth. lies.. The fact is, there has never been a single study on the human safety of these products. Until that time, consumers were generally not very aware of the potential of this research. Find out everything you need know food it s side effects programme areas 2007 important notices last revision date 19-12-2013 next venture biotechnology companies working united states military. It is NOT safe. These questions and answers have been prepared by WHO in response to questions and concerns from WHO Member State Governments with regard to the nature and safety of genetically modified food. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as organisms (i. e. Genetically modified food research papers.